Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

 Mubasher Mir

Karachi witnessed two landmark developments this week that signal the beginning of a new era in Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations — one that goes beyond religious and historical ties to embrace economic growth, technology, and youth empowerment.

A New Phase of Economic Cooperation

Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah hosted Prince Mansour bin Mohammed Al Saud, Chairman of the Saudi–Pakistan Business Council, who led a 30-member high-level business delegation to Karachi.

During the meeting at the Chief Minister’s House, both sides held in-depth discussions on investment opportunities in Sindh’s key sectors — industry, energy, agriculture, and infrastructure.

Murad Ali Shah briefed the delegation on the province’s economic potential, highlighting Sindh’s pioneering success with Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects such as Thar Coal, industrial zones, water supply schemes, and road infrastructure.

He assured that the provincial government offers a transparent, secure, and investor-friendly environment, with simplified procedures for international investors.

Prince Mansour bin Mohammed Al Saud praised Sindh’s progress and emphasized that Saudi Arabia views Pakistan as a regional hub for trade and energy. He said Saudi investors are keen to take part in Pakistan’s privatization initiatives and are closely examining opportunities in multiple fields.

Both sides agreed to form joint working groups to accelerate cooperation in priority areas.

A presentation shared with the Saudi delegation noted Sindh’s vital role in Pakistan’s GDP and its immense potential in energy, minerals, agriculture, food processing, tourism, and logistics.

Examples of successful projects with the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Engro, and Shanghai Electric were cited as proof of Sindh’s investor-friendly climate.

During the visit, two energy sector MoUs were signed — one related to the sale and purchase of shares in K-Electric Limited, and another establishing strategic cooperation between K-Electric and Trident Energy Limited.

These agreements mark a growing international confidence in Pakistan’s energy market and underline Sindh’s vision for sustainable economic growth.

Youth, Technology, and Sports – A Shared Vision

In a separate event at the Governor House, Sindh Governor Kamran Khan Tessori and Prince Mansour bin Mohammed Al Saud witnessed the signing of two additional Memoranda of Understanding aimed at promoting cooperation in IT education, technology, and sports development.

The ceremony was attended by Saudi Ambassador Nawaf Saeed Al-Maliki, Pakistani Ambassador Ahmed Farooq, Saudi Consul General Mohammed Abdullah Al-Subaie, and other dignitaries.

Under these MoUs, both nations will collaborate on advanced IT education, training programs, youth exchange initiatives, and joint sports events.

Governor Tessori said, “Pakistan and Saudi Arabia share a relationship rooted in brotherhood and mutual trust. These youth-oriented projects will add a new dimension to our partnership.”

He announced that a friendly cricket match between Pakistani and Saudi teams will soon be organized to further strengthen people-to-people ties.

The Governor stressed that education, technology, and sports are essential to a progressive future. “Providing modern education and training to our youth is the government’s foremost priority,” he added.

Prince Mansour commended the Governor’s efforts and said Saudi Arabia recognizes the extraordinary talent of Pakistani youth and will continue practical cooperation for their advancement.

He reiterated that Saudi Arabia is eager to expand its partnership with Pakistan in education, technology, and sports — areas vital to both nations’ future.

A Strategic Alignment

The two Karachi events symbolize a strategic and economic shift in Pakistan–Saudi relations.

For Sindh, they promise fresh investment, economic stability, and employment opportunities, while for Pakistan’s youth, they open doors to education, innovation, and global exposure.

This cooperation reflects a growing synergy between Saudi Vision 2030 and Sindh’s development agenda, representing a shared vision for a modern, progressive, and interconnected future — one where the two brotherly nations translate goodwill into actionable partnership.

Political Calm in the Making

Meanwhile, in a separate development, a high-level political meeting took place in Nawabshah, where President Asif Ali Zardari met with Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, and Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi.

According to the Presidency, the meeting reviewed the country’s political, security, and regional situation in detail. Ishaq Dar briefed the President on his recent United Nations General Assembly engagements and meetings with world leaders.

Sources said the discussion also focused on reducing political tension between the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). The government team conveyed the Prime Minister’s special message, emphasizing dialogue and mutual understanding as the only path forward.

It was decided that both parties will resolve differences through consultation and that the federal government will address PPP’s concerns without delay. Coordination between Sindh and Punjab governments will also be restored to strengthen administrative and development cooperation.

Leaders agreed to avoid controversial statements and promote a political climate of reconciliation and cooperation.

Observers describe the meeting as an important confidence-building step between the federal and provincial leadership, raising hopes for political stability and continuity of democracy.

Afghan Refugee Movements from Karachi

Amid growing Pakistan–Afghanistan border tensions, reports have emerged suggesting the departure of Afghan refugees from Karachi. However, official confirmation regarding the number of returnees and specific localities remains pending.

Conclusion

From economic diplomacy with Saudi Arabia to political reconciliation at home, the past week in Karachi has underscored Pakistan’s broader shift toward strategic cooperation, political maturity, and regional engagement.

If these initiatives sustain their momentum, Sindh could soon become a model of foreign investment and youth-led progress, while Pakistan stands to benefit from renewed unity and global confidence.

Political Diary Karachi

 Political Diary Karachi

Mubasher Mir

The recent Solidarity Gaza March on Karachi’s Shahrah-e-Faisal has once again demonstrated that the people of Pakistan stand firmly with the Palestinian cause. The turnout was massive, emotional, and politically meaningful, reflecting that for ordinary Pakistanis, Palestine is not a distant issue but an existential one tied to Muslim identity and global justice.

The message was crystal clear: Israel remains unacceptable, the “two-state solution” is a non-starter, and Hamas is viewed as the true face of Palestinian resistance.

Gaza and the Pakistani Conscience

The highlight of the march was the speech of Jamaat-e-Islami Ameer Hafiz Naeem-ur-Rehman, who recalled the historic words of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, declaring that Pakistan would never recognize Israel. His bold demand that Pakistan open a Hamas office within its territory exposed the sharp gap between public sentiment and state policy.

The ordinary people of Pakistan, alongside political workers across divides, align themselves with the martyrs, children, and women of Gaza. The state, however, remains silent, bound by American influence and diplomatic compulsions.

A striking aspect of the rally was the participation of leaders from different political and sectarian backgrounds. This underlined that the Palestinian cause transcends party lines and unites the Muslim Ummah. Speakers pointedly criticized the paralysis of the United Nations and the monopoly of the United States, which have left Palestinians trapped in a cycle of oppression.

Notably, the marchers also condemned the Abraham Accords, singling out Arab governments attempting to normalize ties with Israel. Pakistanis, once again, made their position unambiguous: they will not support any deal that sidelines Palestinian resistance or legitimizes Israel.

But here lies the test: Can Pakistan’s rulers translate this public passion into actual policy?

Beyond Slogans: Steps Pakistan Must Take

Mass rallies and fiery speeches are important but insufficient. What Pakistan needs is policy backed by action:

1. Diplomatic and material aid for the Palestinians must be increased.

2. A joint Islamic bloc strategy must be pursued to pressurize Israel internationally.

3. Pakistan’s historic and ideological stance must not be diluted under foreign pressure.

At a time when Palestinians are surrounded by death and destruction, Pakistan’s solidarity is praiseworthy. Yet the real challenge is for the state: will it choose bold, principled leadership, or remain paralyzed by expediency?

Karachi: The Neglected Lifeline

While Karachi stood for Gaza on the streets, its own story is one of deep neglect. At a Pakistan Business Forum roundtable, former Finance Secretary Younis Dagha revealed shocking numbers: Karachi has been denied Rs 3,360 billion in the 15 years since 2010. Funds that could have modernized infrastructure and completed essential projects like K-4 water supply, Circular Railway, BRT systems, and road networks never reached the city.

The figures tell a damning story. Of Pakistan’s Rs 12,500 billion federal budget, a colossal Rs 8,000 billion comes from Karachi, while the rest of the country contributes only Rs 4,500 billion. Despite being the economic engine—through industries, ports, exports, and taxes—Karachi remains crippled by broken roads, water shortages, power failures, and outdated transport.

One question dominates: If Karachi generates 67 percent of the country’s revenues, why is it left in ruins?

The answer lies in systemic misgovernance. The Sindh government under the PPP has presided over a ballooning provincial budget, from Rs 450 billion to Rs 3,500 billion in 15 years. Yet the KMC budget remains stuck at Rs 25 billion, leaving Karachi starved.

Opposition Leader Saifuddin Advocate summed up the decay: under Mayor Naimatullah Khan, even a union committee chairman could build all roads in his constituency; today, getting a single road repaired is a monumental task. Resources exist, but priorities and honesty do not.

The injustice to Karachi is not local—it sabotages Pakistan’s national economy. Without modern infrastructure, water, and transport projects, Pakistan cannot achieve sustainable growth.

What Karachi Needs

Rs 880 billion annually, its fair share, must be allocated.

Port and octroi revenues should be reinvested directly in the city.

Local governments must be empowered financially and administratively.

Above all, transparency is vital to prevent corruption from devouring development funds.

Karachi is not merely Sindh’s capital—it is Pakistan’s economic backbone. To weaken it is to undermine Pakistan itself. If policymakers continue their apathy, public trust will collapse, and even the integrity of the state may face erosion.

Water Disputes and Federal Trust

Another brewing storm is the federal water dispute. Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz’s recent remarks on a controversial canal project ignited backlash from the PPP Sindh, which termed her statements a violation of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) decision.

According to PPP Sindh President Nisar Khuhro, the project had already been unanimously rejected by the CCI, making Maryam’s words unconstitutional and damaging to federal trust. Sindh’s long-standing fear is that Punjab seeks dominance over Indus waters, leaving tail-end Sindh vulnerable.

Khuhro reminded that Nawaz Sharif himself shelved divisive projects like the Kalabagh Dam to preserve national unity—insight Maryam appears to lack.

Here arises a critical question: Were Maryam’s remarks mere rhetoric for provincial politics, or an early outline of government policy? If it is the latter, Pakistan could face serious provincial confrontation.

The PPP has also accused the Punjab government of mishandling flood relief, alleging deliberate cuts that saved elite properties while drowning poor farmers. If substantiated, this would be not only mismanagement but outright social injustice.

The Punjab government must come clean: how much aid was allocated, from what sources, and how transparently it was distributed. Without facts, political accusations will continue to erode trust.

The Need for Trust and Constitutionality

Pakistan’s federation rests on trust, fairness, and adherence to constitutional forums. The CCI exists to ensure equitable resource allocation. If provincial governments defy its authority, the result will be discord and weakened national cohesion.

Maryam Nawaz and Punjab must respect institutional decisions and avoid statements that inflame sensitivities. At the same time, the PPP should avoid exploiting such issues for political mileage and instead propose constructive solutions.

Conclusion: Three Fronts, One Test

From Gaza solidarity, to Karachi’s deprivation, to water disputes, Pakistan faces challenges that are deeply interconnected. Each represents a test of leadership, principle, and governance.

On Palestine, Pakistan must move beyond slogans and take principled diplomatic steps.

On Karachi, justice in resource allocation and governance reform is essential for economic stability.

On water disputes, constitutional forums and provincial trust must be protected at all costs.

The lesson is simple: Pakistan cannot afford expediency. Whether in foreign policy or domestic governance, principled stands and transparent action are the only path to restore public trust and safeguard the federation.

A Tale of Meritocracy’s Failure in Pakistan

 Under the Table:

 A Tale of Meritocracy’s Failure in Pakistan

Mubasher Mir

Meritocracy—the belief that individuals should rise by virtue of talent, hard work, and integrity—has long been presented as the ideal foundation of any successful society. Yet in Pakistan, merit often finds itself strangled under the heavy weight of favoritism, nepotism, and under-the-table deals. The consequence is not just a broken system of recruitment; it is a nation-wide disillusionment that continues to suffocate generations of professionals, thinkers, and dreamers.

I write this piece not as an abstract observer but as a witness—and participant—in the very processes that claim to champion meritocracy but collapse under its weight when confronted with power, politics, and vested interests

A Personal Window: The State Bank Episodes

In 2008, when Pakistan was transitioning after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Yousaf Raza Gilani rose as Prime Minister and Asif Ali Zardari took charge as President. Amid this reshaping of political power, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) announced vacancies, including the critical post of Chief Spokesperson.

Like many journalists and communication professionals, I applied. The competition was tough; more than twenty seasoned candidates, each with years of field experience, were shortlisted. The promise was clear: a rigorous, merit-based process that would identify the most competent candidate.

But as is often the case in Pakistan, reality diverged from rhetoric. Instead of appointing fresh talent, the SBP extended the tenure of the incumbent, Wasimuddin, who was nearing retirement. That decision may have suited the status quo, but it shredded the very spirit of meritocracy. It signaled that institutions valued continuity of “trusted” faces over infusion of new perspectives.

Fast-forward to 2013. Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N returned to power with slogans of transparency and change. Again, advertisements filled newspapers promising opportunities for young professionals. Again, the SBP invited applications for its Chief spokesperson’s slot. This time, around a dozen candidates, mostly from media, reached the interview stage.

The process, however, felt more like theater than substance. The interview panel, which included the Chief Economist and Deputy Governor, asked questions that revealed a startlingly narrow understanding of communication. When one panelist inquired, “How will you stop news that could be detrimental to the State Bank?” I was stunned. Was the job of a spokesperson to suppress information rather than explain and clarify it?

I replied honestly—that my approach would be to build bridges between the institution and the public through timely communication, including social media outreach. Yet the panel dismissed the suggestion. “We are a regulatory authority; we don’t need social media,” one member remarked with bureaucratic certainty. Ironically, just months later, the same SBP proudly launched its social media presence and a new website—without appointing anyone from the advertised pool of candidates. The position was quietly filled by an internal transfer.

For me, the sting wasn’t personal rejection; it was the realization that the entire process had been a charade. Advertisements, shortlisting, and interviews were little more than window-dressing—gestures to display a commitment to merit while ensuring decisions were already made behind closed doors.

The Broader Crisis: When Talent Meets Walls

My story is only one of thousands echoing across Pakistan. Talk to any young graduate, mid-career professional, or senior specialist, and the refrain is depressingly similar: “Merit doesn’t matter here.”

In government departments, the culture of sifarish (connections) remains stronger than CVs. In corporations, loyalty to personalities often outweighs performance. And in academia, appointments sometimes reflect political affiliations more than scholarly credentials.

The consequences are devastating:

 Brain Drain: Every year, thousands of Pakistan’s brightest minds migrate to Canada, the Gulf, Europe, and beyond. They leave not because they lack patriotism but because the system here refuses to recognize their talent.

Disillusionment: For those who stay, the constant rejection in favor of “connected” candidates leads to hopelessness. Depression among young professionals is not just a private health issue—it is a national tragedy

Stagnation: Institutions that deny merit stagnate. Without fresh ideas and capable leaders, organizations recycle mediocrity, becoming increasingly irrelevant in a fast-changing world.

 Erosion of Trust: Citizens lose faith not only in organizations but in the very idea of fairness. When rules appear rigged, cynicism grows. And cynicism, once rooted, eats away at social cohesion.

The Human Cost: Stories of the Overlooked

Consider the plight of young women entering the workforce. For them, the barriers are doubled. Meritocracy is already fragile; add to it the cultural biases and systemic sexism, and opportunities shrink further. A female graduate from a prestigious university may face questions not about her skills but about her “ability” to balance work and family. How many bright women, discouraged at the very gates, give up their professional dreams before they even begin?

Or think of the middle-class professional who spends years studying abroad on scholarships, returning with advanced degrees and global exposure. Instead of being embraced, they often find themselves sidelined in favor of less qualified but better connected individuals. Many end up taking jobs far below their skill level, or eventually re-migrating, their energy wasted.

Each such case is more than an individual disappointment—it is a national loss.

Why Pakistan Cannot Afford This

Some argue that nepotism and favoritism exist everywhere. True, no system is perfect. But in Pakistan, the scale and brazenness of these practices threaten national survival.

Economic Growth: A country’s economy grows when talent is harnessed efficiently. Pakistan, however, sidelines its talent, choking innovation and competitiveness.

Governance: Institutions run on mediocrity cannot deliver good governance. The inability of regulatory bodies, public institutions, and corporations to adapt to the digital era is proof enough.

Youth Bulge: With 64% of its population under 30, Pakistan faces a demographic tsunami. If opportunities are denied, frustration will turn into unrest. A nation with unemployed, disillusioned youth is a ticking time bomb.

Towards a Culture of Merit

The solution is neither easy nor immediate. Yet it is urgent and possible if pursued with sincerity.

 Transparent Recruitment: Every public and corporate entity must adopt transparent hiring practices. Job advertisements, shortlisting criteria, interview scores—all should be made publicly available.

 Independent Oversight: Regulatory bodies, much like the Election Commission, should oversee recruitment processes in critical institutions.

 Merit Incentives: Organizations that demonstrably follow meritocracy should receive state and civil society recognition. Public rankings, certifications, or awards can create positive pressure.

 Digital Audits: Technology can help. Online testing, automated shortlisting, and digital audit trails can reduce human manipulation.

 Cultural Shift: Ultimately, no system can work unless society values merit. Parents, teachers, and leaders must emphasize that personal connections should not be a substitute for competence.

A Call for Human Dignity

At its heart, the cry for meritocracy is a cry for dignity. When an individual spends years learning, training, and striving, they deserve at least a fair chance to be evaluated. To deny them that chance is to rob them not only of opportunity but of self-worth.

The humanistic dimension of this crisis is rarely discussed. Professionals rejected unfairly carry scars. They lose confidence, question their value, and sometimes abandon their passions altogether. Behind every “unsuccessful” candidate is a family that invested hopes, money, and sacrifice. Behind every brain drain story is a silent mourning for what Pakistan could have been.

Pakistan at a Crossroads

Pakistan cannot progress on slogans alone. “Youth empowerment,” “innovation,” “digital Pakistan”—these remain hollow until backed by a culture that rewards competence. Without meritocracy, the best minds will remain underutilized, and the cycle of mediocrity will deepen.

The tragedy is that Pakistan does not lack talent. Its problem is the walls placed in front of talent. Tear down those walls, and the nation will surprise the world.

It is time we stopped paying lip service to merit and started practicing it. For every professional sidelined by nepotism, for every young graduate disheartened at the start of their career, for every woman told “this is not for you,” Pakistan owes a debt. That debt can only be paid by building a society where what you know matters more than who you know.

Until then, merit will remain under the table, and Pakistan will continue to pay the price.

Karachi Political Diary:

 Karachi Political Diary:

 Between Power Games and Public Woes

 Mubashir Mir

Pakistan’s political landscape has always been marked by turbulence, and Sindh has remained at its epicenter. Karachi, the country’s commercial capital and the heart of Sindh, is where politics, economy, and society collide most visibly. The past weeks have once again underscored this reality: a major cabinet reshuffle, a judicial degree scandal, devastating floods, and the continuing rhetoric of politicians have shaped public debate. While foreign relations, particularly with China, offer glimmers of hope, the fundamental issues of governance and public service remain unresolved.

This editorial seeks to examine these developments in detail, weighing their implications for democracy, governance, and the daily lives of citizens.

A Cabinet Reshuffle or Political Balancing?

On September 27, 2025, the Sindh government announced a significant reshuffle in its provincial cabinet. The move expanded the cabinet to 23 members and reassigned several critical portfolios.

Saeed Ghani, one of the more visible leaders of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), was shifted from the sensitive Local Government Ministry to Labour & Social Protection.

Syed Nasir Hussain Shah, already carrying the Energy portfolio, was entrusted with Local Government, effectively concentrating two powerful ministries in his hands.

Jam Khan Shoro, Minister for Irrigation, received the additional charge of Planning and Development, a department that controls billions in development spending.

Makhdoom Mehboob-uz-Zaman was reassigned to Food, replacing his previous role in Relief.

Ismail Rahoo was sworn in as Minister for Universities and Boards, while Gian Chand Israni joined as adviser. Four special assistants — Faraz Abid Lakhani, Sham Sundar, Atta Muhammad Panhwar, and Tariq Hassan — were inducted with responsibilities in IT, antiquities, relief, and minority affairs.

At face value, the reshuffle appears administrative. But in Sindh’s political tradition, such moves rarely lack deeper meaning. The Ministry of Local Government is pivotal: it controls Karachi’s development projects, municipal corporations, and urban planning — areas where political stakes are high. By moving Ghani aside and empowering Shah, the PPP has signaled both its preference for tested hands and its desire to recalibrate power within its ranks.

Yet the fundamental question remains: will this political balancing deliver tangible relief to citizens? Karachi continues to grapple with crumbling infrastructure, garbage mismanagement, water shortages, and unchecked urban sprawl. Unless the ministry’s resources are deployed with efficiency and transparency, the shuffle may amount to nothing more than musical chairs.

The Judiciary Under Fire: Jahangiri’s Degree Controversy

While Sindh reshuffled its ministers, the judiciary faced a credibility crisis. Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri of the Islamabad High Court has seen his law degree from the University of Karachi revoked. The University’s Syndicate, after an investigation by the Unfair Means Committee, declared his 1987 enrollment “fraudulent.” His seat number and enrollment ID have been formally withdrawn, and he has been barred for three years from any further academic pursuits at Karachi University.

The decision is momentous. It is not merely about one judge but the institutional integrity of the judiciary. If the allegation holds, it reflects catastrophic lapses in vetting processes — how could someone with a fake credential ascend to such judicial heights? Conversely, if the allegations prove unfounded, it would reveal a coordinated attempt to tarnish judicial independence by bringing a sitting judge into disrepute.

Already, Jahangiri has been suspended from judicial duties, and the case is pending before the Supreme Judicial Council. The public, however, is watching with alarm. Trust in Pakistan’s judiciary is fragile; years of political engineering, delayed justice, and perceived bias have eroded its standing. The Jahangiri scandal, unless resolved with transparency and speed, will only deepen this distrust. For citizens who view the judiciary as the last refuge of justice, such controversies are not minor—they strike at the heart of constitutionalism.

Floods: A Recurring Tragedy

While politicians squabble and judges face scrutiny, nature has delivered yet another reminder of governance failure. Heavy monsoon rains and water releases from India have swelled the Indus River, displacing over 100,000 people in Sindh this September alone. Dozens of villages have been inundated; crops, particularly rice and cotton, have been devastated; and thousands of families are now living in makeshift camps with shortages of food, medicine, and clean drinking water.

This is not an isolated incident. In 2022, Pakistan experienced one of the worst floods in its history, killing 1,739 people and displacing millions. Damage was estimated at over $30 billion, according to the World Bank. Sindh was the hardest-hit province, with nearly half of all flood-related casualties.

Yet, three years on, little has changed. Drainage systems remain clogged, embankments unrepaired, and disaster preparedness underfunded. Relief efforts too often appear limited to photo opportunities for politicians rather than meaningful rehabilitation. International NGOs and the United Nations continue to step in with aid, but the state’s own capacity to protect its people appears stagnant.

The annual cycle of devastation demands structural solutions: investments in flood-resilient infrastructure, better urban planning, effective warning systems, and climate-resilient agriculture. Without this, Sindh’s people will continue to relive the same disaster every monsoon season.

Political Rhetoric vs. Public Service

Pakistan’s political class, meanwhile, seems trapped in rhetoric. Government and opposition leaders alike hold daily press conferences, trading accusations and hurling blame. Inflation, which crossed 20 percent in mid-2025 according to State Bank data, unemployment affecting 6.5 percent of the workforce, and a public health system stretched thin receive little sustained attention.

The recent verbal sparring between ministers of Punjab and Sindh exemplifies the malaise: much noise, little substance. The public, battered by economic stress and environmental crises, is increasingly alienated. Democratic systems rest on trust, but when citizens see politics reduced to television soundbites, faith in both governance and opposition evaporates.

Politics, in essence, is meant to be about service. In Pakistan, it has too often become an arena for power plays. The Sindh cabinet reshuffle, the Jahangiri scandal, and flood mismanagement illustrate how personal and party interests override systemic reform.

A Ray of Hope: Pak-China Relations

Amid this grim picture, foreign relations provide a rare moment of optimism. The Chinese Consulate General in Karachi recently celebrated China’s National Day with a high-profile ceremony attended by Sindh’s Chief Minister, Governor, and business leaders.

China reaffirmed its commitment to Pakistan, highlighting the ongoing China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects. Despite global skepticism, CPEC has already facilitated investments in energy, transport, and infrastructure worth $25 billion since 2015, according to official figures. Karachi’s port, highways linking Gwadar to the north, and power plants across Sindh stand as evidence of this cooperation.

For Pakistan, struggling with debt, inflation, and governance challenges, Chinese partnership is not just an economic necessity but also a diplomatic lifeline. The challenge is to ensure that these projects do not remain isolated enclaves of progress but instead connect with and uplift ordinary citizens — from providing jobs to improving energy supply.

Journalists Under Fire

Adding to the atmosphere of insecurity is the continuing threat to journalists. Karachi TV anchor Imtiaz Mir succumbed to injuries after a targeted shooting this month. His death is not an isolated incident: at least eight journalists have been killed in Sindh over the past two years, according to the Pakistan Press Foundation.

The trend underscores the perilous state of press freedom in Pakistan, ranked 150th out of 180 countries in the 2025 Reporters Without Borders index. Journalists investigating corruption, crime, or political excess remain particularly vulnerable. For a province already grappling with governance failures, the silencing of critical voices further erodes accountability.

Conclusion: Beyond Rhetoric to Real Service

Sindh today mirrors the larger Pakistani dilemma. Cabinet reshuffles keep party elites balanced but rarely translate into better services for citizens. Judicial scandals shake the foundations of public trust. Floods continue to expose administrative paralysis. Politicians indulge in rhetoric while people suffer in silence. Journalists pay with their lives for daring to tell the truth.

And yet, amid this bleak picture, the enduring friendship with China shows how international partnerships can serve as levers of hope. If harnessed with sincerity and strategy, they could strengthen Pakistan’s economy and perhaps inject momentum into governance.

The people of Sindh — indeed all of Pakistan — are no longer interested in power games. They want clean water, reliable electricity, functioning schools, accessible healthcare, safety in their streets, and jobs for their youth. Until the leadership shifts its priorities from rhetoric to genuine service, Pakistan’s democratic promise will remain unfulfilled.

It is time our politics evolved beyond cabinet musical chairs and verbal duels. Governance must be measured not by how well power is distributed among party loyalists, but by how effectively the lives of ordinary citizens are improved.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi  Political Diary

 Mubashir Mir

The Bhutto family once again dominated Pakistan’s political landscape last week. While President Asif Ali Zardari concentrated on the country’s worsening flood crisis and international diplomacy, the younger generation—Fatima Bhutto and her brother Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Jr.—stepped into the limelight with the announcement of a new political party. This parallel activity underscored two distinct faces of Bhutto politics: statecraft on one side, and reformist idealism on the other.

Zardari and the Flood Crisis

With meteorological warnings of torrential rains in Sindh and southern Punjab, President Zardari directed the administration to remain on high alert. District and tehsil-level officials were instructed to position relief machinery and monitor sensitive water bodies, including the Hub Dam. In solidarity with flood victims, the President stressed that both federal and provincial governments, alongside the armed forces and welfare institutions, must prioritize rehabilitation efforts.

Meeting Punjab Governor Sardar Saleem Haider, he reviewed urgent relief measures for the displaced. These instructions came against the backdrop of staggering losses: over 4,400 villages inundated, more than 4.2 million people affected, and thousands of acres of farmland devastated—destroying standing crops, livestock, and rural infrastructure.

A Diplomatic Venture to China

From September 12 to 21, President Zardari embarked on a rare ten-day official visit to China, covering Chengdu, Shanghai, and Xinjiang. The agenda includes expansion of trade ties, review of CPEC projects, and broader economic cooperation. Analysts describe this unusually long single-country visit as a reflection of Pakistan’s deepening dependence on Beijing, particularly at a time when balancing relations with the West, the United States, China, and Russia requires delicate diplomacy.

The visit carries historic undertones: while Pakistan has inked agreements with Washington for mining projects in Balochistan, it continues to lean on China, which has openly supported Islamabad in past conflicts with India. The message is clear—Pakistan’s future stability hinges on carefully calibrated international alignments, supported by internal political harmony.

Fatima Bhutto’s Cultural and Political Voice

Meanwhile, Fatima Bhutto is emerging as a new intellectual-political force. Along with her brother, Zulfikar Jr., she announced the formation of a new political party independent of the PPP, declaring that today’s People’s Party has drifted from the founding vision of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.

Speaking on Pakistan’s cultural identity, Fatima lauded the “poetic” essence of local dramas and warned against copying Bollywood. She argued that Pakistan’s creative industry could establish itself globally if it embraced authenticity. Her words resonated as a call for self-respect in both politics and art, contrasting sharply with the transactional nature of contemporary governance.

The Flood and the IMF Dilemma

At the federal level, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif instructed the Finance Ministry to negotiate a one-month waiver on electricity bills for flood-affected areas. While this relief is essential, economists caution that IMF approval will be decisive, raising concerns about sovereignty. Dependence on external lenders often results in strict conditionalities—forcing budget cuts in health, education, and social sectors—at a time when humanitarian needs are greatest.

This tension between immediate relief and long-term economic autonomy reflects Pakistan’s central dilemma: survival today versus sovereignty tomorrow.

Bilawal Bhutto’s Role

Sindh’s Information Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon praised PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari as a “ray of hope” for flood victims. He emphasized Bilawal’s personal concern for the affected communities, noting his visits to central and southern Punjab and Sindh. Bilawal reportedly worked with Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah and provincial ministers to formulate a rehabilitation strategy, particularly focused on reviving the battered agricultural sector.

Yet, Memon also lamented delays in the federal government’s special relief package under the Benazir Income Support Programme, reminding that the Prime Minister had already assured Bilawal of such aid. He further echoed Bilawal’s criticism of the federal delay in seeking international assistance through the United Nations, calling it “incomprehensible.”

The Human Question in Sindh Politics

Observers point out that Sindh’s politics remains locked in dynastic patterns. Most members of political families, despite foreign education, fail to adopt people-centric politics upon their return. The persistence of corruption stories each year illustrates how little has changed. Genuine transformation, they argue, demands a politics rooted in service and accountability rather than inheritance and patronage.

At a time when millions face homelessness, hunger, and loss of livelihood due to floods, the contrast between political showmanship and human suffering has never been sharper. The test for Pakistan’s leadership—whether Zardari’s statecraft, Bilawal’s populism, or Fatima’s reformist idealism—is whether they can shift politics from power to people.

Cricket Should Not Be a Conflict Zone

 Cricket Should Not Be a Conflict Zone

 Mubashir Mir

Cricket in South Asia has always been more than a sport. For millions in Pakistan and India, it is not merely a game of bat and ball; it is a stage where national pride, political tensions, and historic grievances play out. Whenever Pakistan and India face each other, the contest is not limited to the boundaries of a cricket field—it becomes a mirror of political rivalry, cultural identity, and, often, hostility. Yet, cricket by its very essence was meant to be a unifier, a sport that binds communities through fair competition. Unfortunately, in recent decades, the game has been increasingly politicized, turning what should be a festival of sport into a conflict zone.

The Roots of a Fierce Rivalry

The rivalry between Pakistan and India on the cricket field dates back to October 1952, when Pakistan played its first-ever Test series in Delhi. Since then, every match has carried the weight of political history—wars in 1965 and 1971, the Kargil conflict in 1999, and recurring border skirmishes have shaped the narrative of the two nations.

Despite political mistrust, cricket thrived as a cultural bridge at times. In the 1980s and 1990s, Pakistan often dominated India in one-day internationals, particularly in Sharjah, where Javed Miandad’s iconic last-ball six against India in 1986 became a defining memory for Pakistani fans. Similarly, the 1989 Bangalore Test, where Pakistan defeated India on its home soil, remains etched as a moment of national pride. In Kolkata in 1999, Pakistan won an ODI in front of more than 100,000 spectators—an atmosphere both intimidating and electric.

By the early 2000s, Pakistan led India 82–47 in ODIs, and 12–9 in Test matches. These figures illustrate how competitive and often one-sided Pakistan’s dominance used to be. Yet, history is dynamic, and over the last two decades, the balance of power shifted dramatically.

The Shift of Power: Two Decades of Indian Ascendancy

Since the turn of the millennium, India’s cricket has undergone a transformation. The rise of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) as the world’s richest cricket board gave India immense influence in the International Cricket Council (ICC). The launch of the Indian Premier League (IPL) in 2008 further consolidated India’s financial dominance, attracting global stars and billions in revenue.

In contrast, Pakistan cricket suffered a series of setbacks. The 2009 terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan team in Lahore isolated Pakistan internationally, forcing it to play home series in the UAE for more than a decade. India, citing political tensions, refused bilateral cricket after 2012. The head-to-head record also tilted: India now leads Pakistan in ICC World Cup matches 13–1, including a 7–0 record in men’s ODI World Cups.

This stark reversal reflects not only India’s cricketing growth but also Pakistan’s inability to sustain consistency, modernize its domestic structure, and provide stable leadership.

Politics Overshadowing the Spirit of Sport

Cricket, unfortunately, has not remained immune from broader political hostilities. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, ties have worsened. Pulwama and Balakot in 2019 turned into diplomatic flashpoints, spilling into cricketing arenas. Political rhetoric often portrays matches as a “war minus the shooting.” In 2019, during the World Cup in England, Indian fans came dressed as soldiers, making the event appear like a battlefield rather than a sporting contest.

Pakistan too has contributed to the politicization of cricket. National victories against India are often exaggerated as military triumphs, while defeats trigger blame games within the team and administration. This burden of political symbolism deprives players of the freedom to simply play cricket.

The Asia Cup and Umpiring Controversy

The recent Asia Cup once again stirred controversy when Pakistan alleged biased umpiring in their defeat to India. While emotions run high in such clashes, questions about fairness are not new. Several times, review decisions and marginal calls have appeared to favor the stronger side. Critics argue that India’s economic weight in world cricket creates invisible pressures on officials and administrators.

The ICC must address these concerns. Cricket’s credibility lies in its fairness, and no team—no matter how powerful its board—is above the principles of neutrality. If the game is to preserve its integrity, umpires and referees must not only be fair but also be seen to be fair.

Pakistan’s Own Weaknesses

While criticism of the ICC and India is warranted, Pakistan must also confront its internal shortcomings. Leadership remains a concern. The current captain, though statistically consistent, is often accused of lacking the aggressive temperament required for high-pressure India encounters.

Sports psychologists note that Pakistani players enter India matches burdened with anxiety, which hampers performance. Domestic cricket reforms after 2019 weakened the pipeline of talent, reducing opportunities for young cricketers. Fitness standards, fielding weaknesses, and inconsistent batting collapses remain chronic problems. Unless Pakistan addresses these structural flaws, blaming external factors alone will not bring improvement.

The ICC and the Weight of Commercial Interests

The International Cricket Council was once envisioned as the guardian of cricket’s spirit. Yet, critics argue that it has increasingly become a club dominated by three powerful boards—India, Australia, and England (the so-called “Big Three”). India, contributing nearly 70% of ICC’s revenue through broadcasting and sponsorship, enjoys unparalleled clout.

This financial imbalance skews decisions. Neutral venues, umpiring appointments, tournament scheduling—all are influenced by commercial priorities. Smaller boards like Pakistan find their voices sidelined. Fair criticism demands that ICC reform itself to ensure that cricket’s rules are not written merely by financial giants.

The Human Dimension

Beyond politics and profit lies the human reality. For ordinary people in Pakistan and India, cricket is a shared passion. When Sachin Tendulkar praised Wasim Akram’s artistry, or when Shoaib Akhtar joked with Virender Sehwag, it showed the human connection beneath rivalry. Millions of fans on both sides yearn not for hostility but for the joy of sport.

It is heartbreaking that children in Lahore and Delhi, who both dream of becoming fast bowlers or stylish batsmen, are deprived of watching their heroes play bilateral series. Cricket tours once softened political tensions—such as in 2004, when India toured Pakistan and fans embraced players across borders. That humanistic spirit must be revived.

The Way Forward

For cricket to be fair and meaningful, several steps are essential:

 Pakistan’s Reforms

Invest in domestic cricket, fitness, and sports psychology.

Build leadership that can handle pressure in India encounters.

Treat matches against India as sport, not as symbolic wars.

 India’s Responsibility

Separate politics from cricket.

Resume bilateral cricket as a gesture of goodwill.

Avoid using cricket as a tool of nationalism.

 ICC’s Role

Guarantee neutral umpiring and transparent review systems.

Balance financial power with fairness in decision-making.

Protect smaller nations from being marginalized.

 Shared Humanity

Promote cultural exchanges, joint cricket academies, and fan-to-fan interactions.

Encourage former players from both sides to become ambassadors of peace.

Conclusion

Cricket should never become a conflict zone. It should remain what it was meant to be—a celebration of talent, courage, and sportsmanship. India and Pakistan have given the world some of the greatest cricketers—Imran Khan and Kapil Dev, Wasim Akram and Sachin Tendulkar, Waqar Younis and Virat Kohli. Their legacies remind us that cricket at its best transcends borders.

Fair criticism of all stakeholders is essential: Pakistan must strengthen itself internally, India must resist politicizing the game, and ICC must uphold neutrality. The millions of fans who fill stadiums and sit glued to their televisions deserve not a political spectacle but a genuine contest of skill.

Let cricket be the bridge, not the battlefield.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

 Mubasher Mir

Pakistan today stands at a crossroads, facing challenges on multiple fronts. On one hand, the government is making efforts to rebuild public trust through health initiatives; on the other, social tragedies, natural disasters, and economic pressures are weighing heavily on ordinary citizens.  Political diary takes a closer look at these critical issues.

Public Health and the Vaccination Drive

Pakistan recently launched its first nationwide Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign. Federal Health Minister Syed Mustafa Kamal set a rare example of transparency by having his daughter vaccinated in front of the media. The campaign, which began on 15 September 2025, targets girls aged 9 to 14 in order to prevent cervical cancer.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 600,000 women worldwide are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year, and Pakistan is no exception. However, social media has been flooded with conspiracy theories and rumors claiming the vaccine causes infertility and other harmful effects. Scientific research shows no evidence of such claims. The minister clarified this, emphasizing the need for awareness, transparency, and public confidence. This initiative is not just a medical program but also a step towards building a healthier society.

Cruelty Against Animals – A Social Tragedy

A disturbing incident in Sukkur, Sindh exposed the darker side of social behavior. A landowner accused a camel of damaging his crops; the animal was tied to a tractor, dragged, brutally beaten, and left with a broken leg. Police arrested two suspects, while one remains at large.

This was not an isolated event. Similar acts of cruelty have been reported before — for instance, a camel’s leg was severed in Sanghar a few months ago. These incidents reveal both the failure of law enforcement and a wider moral crisis in society. Pakistan does have laws protecting animal rights, but lack of enforcement emboldens perpetrators. The Sindh Chief Minister took notice and promised justice, but unless punishments are swift and public awareness is raised, such cruelty will continue unchecked.

Floods in Sindh – A Recurring Disaster

Sindh once again faces the annual devastation of floods. Rising water levels in the Indus River and overflowing canals have displaced thousands of families, forcing them into temporary shelters.

Floods bring not only destruction of property but also widespread health risks. Contaminated water leads to cholera, diarrhea, and malaria outbreaks. Relief camps have been set up, but complaints of mismanagement, shortages, and delays are mounting. The Sindh PDMA has warned that climate change is intensifying flood risks, making long-term planning and climate resilience strategies urgent.

Economy Under Pressure – Stock Market & Exports

The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) has witnessed sharp volatility in recent days. Investors remain cautious due to political uncertainty, global market instability, and the rupee’s depreciation. Experts note that inflation and rising utility tariffs have pushed business costs higher, directly affecting corporate profitability.

On the trade front, Pakistan’s exports to neighboring countries are shrinking. In FY2025, the trade deficit with neighbors rose by 29% to $12.3 billion. Imports from China and India are surging, while Pakistani exports suffer from low competitiveness, quality issues, and transport bottlenecks. Although trade figures with Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh show some improvement, the overall trend is alarming.

Reviving exports will require structural reforms, incentives for export industries, better trade facilitation, and access to new markets.

Political Scene – PTI’s “Aazaan Movement

On the political front, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has launched the “Aazaan Movement” to pressure the government for free elections and accountability. Initially branded as “Mission Noor”, the campaign sparked controversy and was criticized for religious undertones, eventually forcing a name change.

Despite the criticism, PTI has managed to mobilize crowds across multiple cities. Reports suggest that overseas Pakistanis are also extending their support. While popular participation in politics is a positive sign, the real test for PTI lies in maintaining peaceful demonstrations within the law, ensuring that public issues remain at the forefront rather than descending into conflict.

Blue Economy – Untapped Potential

Pakistan’s 1,046 km coastline gives it a strategic position in the Arabian Sea, yet the contribution of the blue economy to national GDP remains limited to just 2–3%.

Sectors such as fisheries, aquaculture, maritime trade, coastal tourism, and renewable energy hold immense potential. For example, adopting modern fishing technologies could increase seafood exports significantly. According to economic experts, Pakistan could earn billions annually if it invests in coastal infrastructure, attracts foreign investment, and ensures environmental sustainability.

The blue economy is not just about economic growth; it offers opportunities for employment generation, energy diversification, and climate balance — all areas where Pakistan urgently needs solutions.

Conclusion

The current scenario in Pakistan presents a paradox. On one hand, initiatives like the HPV vaccination campaign mark progress in public health; on the other, social tragedies like animal cruelty and recurring floods highlight deep vulnerabilities. The economy remains fragile, with exports declining and markets under pressure. Political movements are reshaping the national debate, while future economic opportunities, such as the blue economy, are still awaiting serious attention.

What Pakistan needs today is collective awareness, governmental seriousness, and active public involvement. Only if health, justice, economy, and environment are treated as equal priorities can Pakistan emerge from its difficulties and move towards prosperity.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

 Mubashir Mir

Sindh today stands at a crossroads where opportunities and crises converge. On the one hand, ambitious infrastructure projects promise to redefine Pakistan’s economic landscape, while on the other, climate-induced floods, public health crises, and political uncertainty cast long shadows. The evolving role of the Bhutto family’s new generation and speculation about the leadership of Sindh further add to the province’s complex political canvas.

Infrastructure Projects: M-6 and M-10 — The Economic Lifelines

At a high-level review meeting in Karachi, Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah and Federal Minister for Communications Aleem Khan assessed the progress of two crucial projects: the Hyderabad–Sukkur Motorway (M-6) and the Karachi Northern Bypass (M-10).

The M-6, a 306-kilometer project long delayed due to funding challenges, is expected to complete the North–South Motorway Link, connecting Karachi Port and Port Qasim with central and northern Pakistan. Experts argue that this corridor will not only facilitate logistics but also create thousands of employment opportunities for Sindh’s youth.

Similarly, the transformation of the M-10 into a modern expressway seeks to reduce Karachi’s chronic traffic congestion. According to the National Highway Authority (NHA), over 35% of Pakistan’s trade cargo passes through Karachi, yet the city loses an estimated Rs. 50 billion annually due to traffic gridlocks. Upgrading the M-10 could ease this bottleneck.

Aleem Khan assured transparency and timely completion — a claim viewed with cautious optimism given Pakistan’s checkered history of delays in mega-projects.

Karachi’s Urban Challenge: Rains, Drains, and Relief

Karachi Mayor Murtaza Wahab took an unusually inclusive step by inviting MQM, Jamaat-e-Islami, PTI, and PML-N to join hands in rain preparedness. “This is not an administration that eats tea and parathas on a café Pealla. We believe in practical measures,” he quipped, underscoring his resolve.

Relief camps have been set up at flood-prone points, while coordination with the Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA) remains active. Yet, past experience shows that urban flooding in Karachi is less about heavy rainfall and more about poor planning, unregulated construction, and encroachment on stormwater drains. The Supreme Court has previously censured Karachi’s civic agencies for negligence.

A Landmark Judicial Verdict: Parks for People, Not Profits

The Sindh High Court (SHC) struck down the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation’s resolution to allow commercial use of public parks under the guise of public–private partnerships. Petitioner Advocate Saifuddin hailed the ruling as “historic,” calling it a milestone in safeguarding Karachi’s civic assets.

The court reaffirmed a principle long ignored in Karachi: urban green spaces are not commodities. With Karachi’s per capita green space already below 0.5 square meters per person (far less than the WHO’s recommended 9 square meters), the ruling is a vital step toward protecting citizens’ right to a livable environment.

Public Health Alarm: Post-COVID Heart Disease Surge

Beyond politics, health institutions in Karachi are grappling with a new reality: a sharp increase in heart disease cases following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aga Khan University Hospital reports that annual heart attack cases doubled from 1,500 pre-pandemic to 3,000 post-pandemic.

The NICVD, South Asia’s largest cardiac hospital, treated 9,925 patients in 2024 alone.

Medical experts believe COVID-19 has lingering cardiovascular impacts, though vaccine-related concerns lack scientific basis. This reflects a global trend: according to the American Heart Association, cardiovascular mortality rose by nearly 15% worldwide during and after the pandemic.

Floods on the Horizon: A Province on Edge

The Provincial Rain and Flood Emergency Monitoring Cell warns that 1,651 villages across 44 talukas are at risk of flooding, potentially displacing 1.6 million people. Already, over 6,000 residents have been evacuated in the last 24 hours.

528 relief camps and 154 medical camps are functional.

Over 878,000 livestock — the backbone of rural Sindh’s economy — have been vaccinated and treated.

President Asif Ali Zardari has directed authorities to keep machinery ready at the tehsil level, especially in low-lying and coastal belts. Continuous monitoring of Hub Dam and other reservoirs is underway to prevent urban flooding.

Climate change has intensified these challenges: Pakistan was ranked 8th most vulnerable country in the Global Climate Risk Index 2021, and Sindh bears the brunt.

Zulfiqar Bhutto Jr.: A New Bhutto Emerges

Amidst environmental and economic pressures, politics in Sindh is entering a new phase with the rise of Zulfiqar Bhutto Jr., son of the late Mir Murtaza Bhutto.

In March 2025, he announced his formal entry into politics, aligning himself with the PPP (Shaheed Bhutto Group). He strongly criticized Punjab’s irrigation projects as “cultural genocide,” highlighting Sindh’s water crisis.

By July 2025, he hinted at forming a new party with his sister Fatima Bhutto, aiming to revive the “original Bhutto ideals.” His outreach to Lyari — the Bhutto family’s historic bastion — signals his intent to reclaim lost ground. His promise to contest elections from Lyari has already energized disillusioned PPP voters.

Observers note that his appeal, particularly among youth and activists, may emerge as a counterbalance to mainstream PPP leadership.

The Murad Ali Shah Question: Rumors of Change

Speculation is rife over a possible change of Sindh’s Chief Minister. While the PPP leadership has issued no official confirmation, analysts link the rumors to growing internal rifts and public criticism of governance.

Murad Ali Shah, despite spearheading mega-projects like M-6 and flood preparedness, remains under judicial scrutiny. A 2018 judgment regarding dual Nationality by Justice Qazi Faez Isa raised questions about his reputation. Shah has since sought to transfer his appeal to a constitutional bench, hoping for relief.

Some political insiders suggest that the growing visibility of Bhutto Jr. and Fatima Bhutto has added pressure on the party to recalibrate leadership. Whether Shah survives this storm will depend on both his performance and the PPP’s internal calculus.

Conclusion: A Province in Transition

Sindh’s story today is one of contrasts. On one hand, motorways and bypasses hold the promise of economic revival; on the other, climate threats loom large, exposing millions to vulnerability. Judicial verdicts are safeguarding civic rights, while the health sector battles post-pandemic realities.

Politically, the Bhutto legacy is being reimagined by a younger generation, while rumors of change at the top keep the ruling PPP unsettled. In this dynamic landscape, one fact is certain: Sindh is at a defining moment where governance, resilience, and leadership will determine whether hope triumphs over hardship.