Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

 Mubashir Mir

Sindh today stands at a crossroads where opportunities and crises converge. On the one hand, ambitious infrastructure projects promise to redefine Pakistan’s economic landscape, while on the other, climate-induced floods, public health crises, and political uncertainty cast long shadows. The evolving role of the Bhutto family’s new generation and speculation about the leadership of Sindh further add to the province’s complex political canvas.

Infrastructure Projects: M-6 and M-10 — The Economic Lifelines

At a high-level review meeting in Karachi, Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah and Federal Minister for Communications Aleem Khan assessed the progress of two crucial projects: the Hyderabad–Sukkur Motorway (M-6) and the Karachi Northern Bypass (M-10).

The M-6, a 306-kilometer project long delayed due to funding challenges, is expected to complete the North–South Motorway Link, connecting Karachi Port and Port Qasim with central and northern Pakistan. Experts argue that this corridor will not only facilitate logistics but also create thousands of employment opportunities for Sindh’s youth.

Similarly, the transformation of the M-10 into a modern expressway seeks to reduce Karachi’s chronic traffic congestion. According to the National Highway Authority (NHA), over 35% of Pakistan’s trade cargo passes through Karachi, yet the city loses an estimated Rs. 50 billion annually due to traffic gridlocks. Upgrading the M-10 could ease this bottleneck.

Aleem Khan assured transparency and timely completion — a claim viewed with cautious optimism given Pakistan’s checkered history of delays in mega-projects.

Karachi’s Urban Challenge: Rains, Drains, and Relief

Karachi Mayor Murtaza Wahab took an unusually inclusive step by inviting MQM, Jamaat-e-Islami, PTI, and PML-N to join hands in rain preparedness. “This is not an administration that eats tea and parathas on a café Pealla. We believe in practical measures,” he quipped, underscoring his resolve.

Relief camps have been set up at flood-prone points, while coordination with the Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA) remains active. Yet, past experience shows that urban flooding in Karachi is less about heavy rainfall and more about poor planning, unregulated construction, and encroachment on stormwater drains. The Supreme Court has previously censured Karachi’s civic agencies for negligence.

A Landmark Judicial Verdict: Parks for People, Not Profits

The Sindh High Court (SHC) struck down the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation’s resolution to allow commercial use of public parks under the guise of public–private partnerships. Petitioner Advocate Saifuddin hailed the ruling as “historic,” calling it a milestone in safeguarding Karachi’s civic assets.

The court reaffirmed a principle long ignored in Karachi: urban green spaces are not commodities. With Karachi’s per capita green space already below 0.5 square meters per person (far less than the WHO’s recommended 9 square meters), the ruling is a vital step toward protecting citizens’ right to a livable environment.

Public Health Alarm: Post-COVID Heart Disease Surge

Beyond politics, health institutions in Karachi are grappling with a new reality: a sharp increase in heart disease cases following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aga Khan University Hospital reports that annual heart attack cases doubled from 1,500 pre-pandemic to 3,000 post-pandemic.

The NICVD, South Asia’s largest cardiac hospital, treated 9,925 patients in 2024 alone.

Medical experts believe COVID-19 has lingering cardiovascular impacts, though vaccine-related concerns lack scientific basis. This reflects a global trend: according to the American Heart Association, cardiovascular mortality rose by nearly 15% worldwide during and after the pandemic.

Floods on the Horizon: A Province on Edge

The Provincial Rain and Flood Emergency Monitoring Cell warns that 1,651 villages across 44 talukas are at risk of flooding, potentially displacing 1.6 million people. Already, over 6,000 residents have been evacuated in the last 24 hours.

528 relief camps and 154 medical camps are functional.

Over 878,000 livestock — the backbone of rural Sindh’s economy — have been vaccinated and treated.

President Asif Ali Zardari has directed authorities to keep machinery ready at the tehsil level, especially in low-lying and coastal belts. Continuous monitoring of Hub Dam and other reservoirs is underway to prevent urban flooding.

Climate change has intensified these challenges: Pakistan was ranked 8th most vulnerable country in the Global Climate Risk Index 2021, and Sindh bears the brunt.

Zulfiqar Bhutto Jr.: A New Bhutto Emerges

Amidst environmental and economic pressures, politics in Sindh is entering a new phase with the rise of Zulfiqar Bhutto Jr., son of the late Mir Murtaza Bhutto.

In March 2025, he announced his formal entry into politics, aligning himself with the PPP (Shaheed Bhutto Group). He strongly criticized Punjab’s irrigation projects as “cultural genocide,” highlighting Sindh’s water crisis.

By July 2025, he hinted at forming a new party with his sister Fatima Bhutto, aiming to revive the “original Bhutto ideals.” His outreach to Lyari — the Bhutto family’s historic bastion — signals his intent to reclaim lost ground. His promise to contest elections from Lyari has already energized disillusioned PPP voters.

Observers note that his appeal, particularly among youth and activists, may emerge as a counterbalance to mainstream PPP leadership.

The Murad Ali Shah Question: Rumors of Change

Speculation is rife over a possible change of Sindh’s Chief Minister. While the PPP leadership has issued no official confirmation, analysts link the rumors to growing internal rifts and public criticism of governance.

Murad Ali Shah, despite spearheading mega-projects like M-6 and flood preparedness, remains under judicial scrutiny. A 2018 judgment regarding dual Nationality by Justice Qazi Faez Isa raised questions about his reputation. Shah has since sought to transfer his appeal to a constitutional bench, hoping for relief.

Some political insiders suggest that the growing visibility of Bhutto Jr. and Fatima Bhutto has added pressure on the party to recalibrate leadership. Whether Shah survives this storm will depend on both his performance and the PPP’s internal calculus.

Conclusion: A Province in Transition

Sindh’s story today is one of contrasts. On one hand, motorways and bypasses hold the promise of economic revival; on the other, climate threats loom large, exposing millions to vulnerability. Judicial verdicts are safeguarding civic rights, while the health sector battles post-pandemic realities.

Politically, the Bhutto legacy is being reimagined by a younger generation, while rumors of change at the top keep the ruling PPP unsettled. In this dynamic landscape, one fact is certain: Sindh is at a defining moment where governance, resilience, and leadership will determine whether hope triumphs over hardship.

 The State of Humanity: A Reflection on Interests and Ethics

Mubasher Mir

In the contemporary global order, the dominance of interests over ethics has become increasingly visible. Both individuals and institutions appear driven more by self-preservation and strategic gain than by the pursuit of collective welfare. This shift is reflected in international indices such as the Human Development Index (HDI), which, despite measuring progress through life expectancy, education, and income, reveals disturbing disparities between economic strength and human well-being.

The Prioritization of State Interests

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has long emphasized that HDI rankings often mirror national economic clout more than the actual quality of life of citizens. Nations, while investing heavily in their defence and security apparatus, often neglect essential services like education, healthcare, and social welfare.

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported that global military expenditure surged to $2.24 trillion in 2022, dominated by the United States, China, and Russia. This figure dwarfs the allocations for sectors directly contributing to human welfare.

The Role of Powerful Countries in Major Political Conflicts

Powerful countries wield significant influence over global governance structures, yet their decisions frequently prioritize geopolitical advantage over humanitarian responsibility. The international arms trade, dominated by leading economies, continues to fuel conflicts, exacerbate instability, and empower regimes that commit human rights violations.

Selective silence also underscores this dynamic. While powers readily intervene in conflicts that threaten their interests, they often remain indifferent to humanitarian crises elsewhere.

Consequences of Prioritizing Interests Over Ethics

The pursuit of interests often leads to human rights abuses, with widespread suppression of free expression, restrictions on assembly, and systemic discrimination. Democratic backsliding is also prevalent, with the erosion of civil liberties, curtailment of media freedom, and weakening of checks and balances. Poverty and inequality persist, with many countries struggling to meet the Sustainable Development Goal of universal health coverage.

The Illusion of Peace and Security

Despite astronomical defence budgets, the world has not become safer. The Global Peace Index (GPI) shows that levels of global peacefulness have steadily declined over the past decade. Violent conflicts, terrorism, and militarization have destabilized several regions, undermining the very security that nations claim to be safeguarding.

Democracy and Governance in Question

Democracy, often celebrated as a universal ideal, is itself under strain. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index 2022 reports widespread democratic regression, with 71 countries experiencing backsliding in recent years. This regression is marked by the erosion of civil liberties, curtailment of media freedom, and the weakening of checks and balances.

Post-COVID Authoritarianism and Suppression of Rights

The COVID-19 pandemic not only reshaped public health priorities but also redefined the relationship between states and their citizens. Under the banner of emergency management, many governments expanded their authority, introducing measures that, while initially justified as necessary for survival, have since evolved into mechanisms of control.

The narrative of “state interest” has grown stronger in the post-pandemic world. Governments often justify restrictions on freedom of movement, assembly, and expression as essential for security or stability. However, these measures have in many cases transformed into tools for silencing dissent.

Citizens demanding justice, activists struggling for their rights, or marginalized groups calling for recognition are frequently branded as “separatists,” “foreign agents,” or even “terrorists.” This tightening grip on civil liberties reflects a deeper global trend: the steady erosion of citizenship rights. From digital surveillance to arbitrary detentions, states increasingly demand compliance while punishing dissent.

Such developments raise pressing questions. If raising one’s voice in support of victims—whether at home or abroad—is treated as disloyalty, what space remains for human rights advocacy? If defending the oppressed is criminalized, can justice ever prevail?

The Fate of the Suppressed

History demonstrates that oppressed communities cannot indefinitely rely on external saviors. While international solidarity has moral value, the reality is that powerful states often weigh interventions against strategic interests rather than ethical imperatives.

The sobering truth is that liberation rarely arrives from outside; it must be forged within. Suppressed and marginalized groups must recognize their agency. Without collective organization, resilience, and self-reliance, their struggles risk being subsumed by the very powers that seek to silence them.

The Search for Ethics and Humanity

In this climate of competing interests, ethics and humanity appear scarce. Yet, history reminds us that societies thrive only when guided by moral responsibility. The search for leadership grounded in ethics remains urgent. A true leader is not one who amplifies the state’s power, but one who places human dignity at the heart of governance.

Conclusion

The world stands at a defining juncture. The prevailing narrative of interests—measured in military spending, geopolitical maneuvering, and short-term economic gain—overshadows the imperative of ethics. Yet genuine progress lies not in the accumulation of power but in the nurturing of human welfare, justice, and accountability.

To reshape the trajectory of global development, states must reorient their priorities. A balanced framework—where security does not eclipse social investment, and where economic ambition does not override ethical responsibility—is essential. The post-COVID era must not become a justification for authoritarianism, but rather an opportunity to reimagine governance rooted in dignity, freedom, and humanity.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

 Mubasher Mir

Pakistan today stands at a defining crossroads—between possibilities that can transform the nation and persistent challenges that continue to haunt its people. Diplomacy, technology, and intellectual progress offer rays of hope, but governmental negligence, judicial inefficiencies, and recurrent natural disasters overshadow these gains. The central question, from the bustling streets of Karachi to the power corridors of Islamabad and the diplomatic missions across the globe, remains the same: Can Pakistan harness its capabilities to overcome its crises, or will opportunities once again be lost to mismanagement?

Diplomacy: New Openings in Karachi

Karachi, Pakistan’s economic hub, has always been a gateway for foreign engagement. This week, two notable diplomatic developments highlight the city’s importance in the international arena.

First, the new German Consul General, Thomas Eberhard Schultz, assumed office in Karachi. His early meetings with Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah and Governor Kamran Tessori have already set the tone for a more cooperative phase in Pakistan–Germany relations. Germany, as Pakistan’s fourth-largest trading partner in the European Union, has historically supported Pakistan in areas of renewable energy, technical education, and cultural exchange. Bilateral trade between the two countries currently hovers around €3.6 billion annually. Schultz’s presence in Karachi opens avenues for increased German investment in Sindh’s industrial and renewable energy sectors, provided Pakistan ensures transparency and governance.

Meanwhile, the United States has appointed Charles Goodman as the new Consul General in Karachi, effective August 28, 2025. Goodman is a seasoned diplomat with postings in Kosovo, New Zealand, Samoa, Lithuania, Georgia, Argentina, and Pakistan (Lahore, 2011). His extensive background in management and his private sector experience spanning two decades in financial services, real estate, and technology give him a unique blend of expertise. Goodman has already emphasized economic cooperation, trade partnerships, and cultural exchange, particularly between the people of Sindh and Balochistan and American citizens.

The appointment signifies a continuity of U.S. interest in Pakistan’s stability and development, even as Washington recalibrates its South Asia strategy post-Afghanistan. For Pakistan, such diplomatic gestures are a reminder that the world is willing to cooperate—if domestic performance matches external goodwill.

Governance on Trial: The Dumper Mafia Case

Diplomatic progress, however, stands in sharp contrast with domestic failures in governance. This week, the Sindh High Court (SHC) heard a petition against the “dumper mafia”—heavy trucks that recklessly roam Karachi’s roads, often without proper regulation. Petitioners revealed that more than 600 lives have been lost in road accidents involving dumpers in the last decade yet authorities remain indifferent.

The SHC’s remarks underline the state’s failure to enforce basic traffic and transport laws. Citizens argue that the police’s complicity, coupled with political patronage for these mafias, has turned Karachi’s roads into death traps. This case is more than just a traffic issue; it is a metaphor for Pakistan’s governance crisis—a system where the weak suffer while the powerful act with impunity. Unless institutions fulfill their constitutional duties, the citizens’ trust in the state will erode further.

Technology: A Ray of Hope

Amid these challenges, Pakistan has witnessed a breakthrough on the technology front. Jazz, the country’s leading telecom operator, has introduced 480-watt Massive MIMO technology for the first time. This upgrade has improved network performance by nearly 340%, paving the way for the long-awaited launch of 5G services.

Pakistan’s telecom sector contributes more than Rs 850 billion annually to the national economy With nearly 191 million cellular subscribers and 131 million broadband users, the sector’s expansion into advanced technologies signals Pakistan’s potential to integrate with the global digital economy. However, the question remains whether the regulatory framework and political vision will keep pace with innovation—or whether technological advances will remain isolated achievements in a broader climate of inefficiency.

Intellectual Capital: Leadership Beyond Business

Another positive development this week was the launch of renowned banker and intellectual Sirajuddin Aziz’s new book, “Corporate Success: Engaged Leadership.” The book emphasizes ethics, empathy, and engagement as pillars of leadership. It has been widely praised by intellectuals and corporate leaders as a guiding framework—not only for business but also for governance.

At a time when Pakistan’s political leadership is often accused of being reactive rather than visionary, Aziz’s message resonates deeply: sustainable success requires integrity, inclusiveness, and foresight. If policymakers and political actors absorb even a fraction of these principles, Pakistan can begin to rebuild its fractured social contract.

Climate Reality: The Looming Floods

While intellectual and technological progress offers hope, nature has once again cast a shadow. The Indus River is swelling, and moderate flooding is feared at Guddu, Sukkur, and Kotri barrages. According to the Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD), water inflows have already surpassed 350,000 cusecs at Guddu, threatening downstream districts such as Kashmore, Shikarpur, Khairpur, Dadu, and Thatta.

The specter of the 2022 floods, which displaced 33 million people and caused $30 billion in damages, still looms large. Experts warn that the Sindh government appears unprepared, despite repeated pledges to strengthen embankments and improve disaster response. The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has issued alerts, but local administrations lack the capacity to provide immediate relief. For residents of riverine Sindh, the question is heartbreaking yet familiar: Will they again be left to sleep under the open sky?

A Tale of Two Pakistans

What emerges from this week’s developments is a tale of two Pakistans.

On one hand, diplomatic engagement, technological innovation, and intellectual output showcase the country’s immense potential. Germany and the U.S. are ready for cooperation; telecom giants are pushing toward 5G; and thought leaders like Sirajuddin Aziz are providing frameworks for progress.

On the other hand, governance paralysis, judicial inertia, and climate vulnerability continue to inflict suffering. The dumper mafia case epitomizes impunity, while looming floods remind us of systemic neglect.

This dichotomy highlights Pakistan’s most pressing dilemma: possibilities exist, but without institutional will, they cannot translate into reality.

The Human Dimension

Beyond statistics and policy debates, it is the ordinary citizen of Karachi, Sukkur, or Dadu who bears the brunt. For the middle-class commuter fearing dumpers, the farmer in Khairpur praying for embankments to hold, or the student in Larkana hoping for stable internet, these issues are not abstract—they define survival and dignity.

Diplomatic ties mean little if citizens remain unprotected; technology will not matter if floods wash away homes; books on leadership cannot inspire unless leaders embody those values. The measure of Pakistan’s progress must be human well-being, not merely international appointments or technical launches.

The Way Forward

Pakistan must adopt far-sighted strategies instead of short-term fixes.

1. Governance Reform – Strict enforcement against mafias, depoliticized policing, and judicial accountability must become priorities.

2. Disaster Preparedness – Sindh must learn from 2022 by strengthening embankments, improving early warning systems, and allocating real budgets for relief.

3. Diplomatic Leverage – Appointments like Schultz and Goodman should be used to attract investment in energy, education, and infrastructure.

4. Technological Advancement – 5G preparation must be aligned with digital governance reforms to ensure equitable access.

5. Leadership Ethics – A shift toward integrity, empathy, and service is essential if politics is to regain public trust.

Conclusion

Pakistan’s story remains one of untapped potential and recurring crises. The world stands ready to engage, knowledge and technology are advancing, and intellectual voices offer guidance. Yet, governance paralysis, judicial gaps, and climate disasters continue to erode the nation’s strength.

The balance is delicate. If Pakistan embraces visionary leadership, institutional accountability, and human-centered development, possibilities can turn into realities. If not, the challenges will harden into permanent scars.

At this critical juncture, the choice is ours: to rise with wisdom and courage, or to drift with negligence into repeated failures.

The Satanic Affair: Unhealed Wound and the Shadow of History

 The Satanic Affair: Unhealed Wound and the Shadow of History

 Mubasher Mir

On the midnight of 14–15 August 1947, the Indian subcontinent—a civilization of rivers and empires, poets and pilgrims—was split into two new nations. The transition was meant to be a celebration of independence, but instead it became one of the largest, bloodiest upheavals in human history. The centuries-old tapestry of culture, language, and faith was severed along hastily drawn borders, leaving a scar that still runs deep.

Mountbatten’s Crucible: Hastening History

In the final days of British rule, political ambition, imperial fatigue, and hurried diplomacy converged in the figure of Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India. His appointment, accelerated by lobbying and imperial calculation, would set in motion decisions that millions would remember as betrayal.

Rumors—of intimacy between Jawaharlal Nehru and Edwina Mountbatten, the Vicereine—spread like wildfire, becoming, for some, the symbol of a deeper political conspiracy. Whether fact or fabrication, this perception hardened into what many in Pakistan later called the “Satanic Affair,” a metaphor for a fateful chain of decisions that still shape the destinies of nearly two billion people.

When Mountbatten assumed the role of Viceroy in March 1947, he inherited a nation on the brink of civil war. His predecessor, Lord Wavell, had worked on the Cabinet Mission Plan—a federated India intended to avoid partition—but the communal riots of Bengal and Punjab had already shattered that vision.

Mountbatten’s original mandate was to transfer power by June 1948. Yet within weeks, he brought the deadline forward by ten months, fearing prolonged instability could engulf the subcontinent in uncontrollable violence. Critics argue that this haste left no time for safe migration, proper policing, or fair boundary demarcation.

The borders themselves were entrusted to Sir Cyril Radcliffe, a British lawyer who had never visited India before. Given just five weeks, Radcliffe drew the lines that became the Radcliffe Award, cutting through villages, families, and farmlands. His decision to award several Muslim-majority tehsils in Punjab to India, and to leave the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir unresolved, planted the seeds of decades of conflict.

The Nehru–Edwina Connection: Politics or Perception?

The alleged romantic bond between Nehru and Edwina Mountbatten remains one of the most sensationalized stories in modern South Asian history. Their surviving correspondence, as published in Pamela Hicks’ Daughter of Empire, reveals deep affection and intellectual kinship. Historians like Alex von Tunzelmann (Indian Summer) note emotional intimacy but find no conclusive evidence of a physical affair.

Still, in the tense political climate of 1947, perception mattered as much as fact. For many in Pakistan, the friendship was recast as a corrupt influence on Mountbatten’s decisions—especially the Radcliffe Award. Whether true or not, the optics were politically damaging, and the belief that Nehru’s closeness to the Vicereine tilted the borders in India’s favor became part of nationalist memory.

Indian National Congress leaders, particularly Nehru and Patel, were seen in Pakistan as harsh, overconfident, and unwilling to compromise.

Jinnah’s Refusal and Diverging Paths

Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the Muslim League and founder of Pakistan, refused to accept Mountbatten as Governor-General of the new nation, seeing it as an infringement on sovereignty. This decision set Pakistan and India on separate, often hostile, trajectories from day one.

Nehru, in contrast, retained Mountbatten as India’s Governor-General for ten months after independence—a move critics in Pakistan saw as political bribery, though others saw it as pragmatic.

Partition unleashed a human tragedy on an unimaginable scale. Between 10 and 15 million people were uprooted in the largest mass migration in history. Trains arrived full of corpses; entire caravans vanished. Estimates of the dead range from 500,000 to over one million. Women bore the heaviest burden—tens of thousands were abducted, raped, or killed in the name of “honor.”

The arbitrary borders left Kashmir a flashpoint, sparking the First Indo-Pakistani War (1947–48) and laying the foundation for future conflicts: 1965, 1971, Siachen, Kargil in 1999, and countless skirmishes since.

Gandhi’s Last Stand

Mahatma Gandhi, opposed to both partition and communal violence, spent his last months fasting, mediating, and urging India to honor its financial commitments to Pakistan. After convincing Nehru’s cabinet to release Rs. 55 crores owed to Pakistan, Gandhi was assassinated in January 1948 by Nathuram Godse—a Hindu nationalist who saw him as a traitor. Gandhi’s death silenced one of the last voices for reconciliation.

From Cold War to Cold Peace

In the decades after partition, Indo-Pak hostility hardened into permanence. Kashmir remained unresolved, disputes over river waters persisted despite the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, and Cold War alignments deepened mistrust.

Pakistan, smaller and weaker economically, devoted over 20% of its budget to defence, sacrificing investment in education, healthcare, and infrastructure. India also expanded its military, with both nations ultimately testing nuclear weapons in 1998.

Democracy in Chains

Both nations began as parliamentary democracies but have seen recurring authoritarian episodes. India’s Emergency (1975–77) under Indira Gandhi suspended civil liberties; in 2019, the Modi government revoked Article 370, altering Jammu & Kashmir’s status—seen by many as an act of repression. Pakistan, meanwhile, endured repeated military coups (1958, 1977, 1999), along with shrinking press freedom and politicized judiciary in recent years.

Economic inequality remains severe: nearly half of rural Pakistan and a quarter of rural India live below their respective poverty lines, with healthcare and literacy—especially for women—still lagging.

The Diaspora and the Lost Dream

Millions from both countries now live abroad—in the UK, US, Canada, and the Gulf. Once, cities like Lahore, Delhi, Karachi, and Calcutta were cosmopolitan hubs of culture and commerce. Today, decades of hostility have made such exchanges rare. The youth of both nations increasingly look abroad for opportunity, leaving behind a region rich in history but starved of cooperation.

A Call for Intellectual Solidarity

The “Satanic Affair” is more than speculation about Nehru and Edwina. It symbolizes the bitter truth that personal relationships, rushed decisions, and imperial disengagement combined to produce an enduring tragedy. Britain, while celebrating its “successful” decolonization, rarely acknowledges the humanitarian disaster it left behind.

For South Asia, a reckoning is overdue. Historians, writers, and civic leaders from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh must speak together: to acknowledge wrongs, resist the politics of hatred, and redirect national energies toward human development.

Seventy-eight years after independence, the people of the subcontinent still share languages, cuisines, and music—yet remain divided by mistrust. The lesson of the “Satanic Affair” is that personal mistrust can be as destructive as political conflict, and that secrecy and haste can wound nations more deeply than open hostility.

Reconciliation will not come from governments alone. It must be built by the people—across borders, religions, and generations—choosing to see one another not as enemies, but as co-heirs to a shared, wounded, and still-beautiful civilization. All nations of the subcontinent must learn to live as good neighbors.

Peace in South Asia ultimately depends on equality—and the key to it lies in New Delhi.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

 Mubasher Mir

Civil Awards: Honour or Controversy?

Every year on Pakistan’s Independence Day, the federal government announces civil awards to recognize individuals from various walks of life. In principle, these awards symbolize merit, service, and excellence. Yet, in practice, they often generate controversy.

This year, too, criticism emerged as a significant number of awards went to politicians, ministers, and media figures considered close to ruling circles. Such decisions weaken the credibility of the civil awards and raise the question: is merit truly the only criterion?

A deeper concern lies in regional imbalance. Most recipients come from major cities—Islamabad, Karachi, and Lahore—while smaller towns and districts, rich with unsung heroes, remain ignored. This exclusion undermines both talent recognition and the spirit of national inclusivity.

To restore credibility, reforms are urgently needed:

District-level nominations must be made mandatory.

Independent committees should include neutral academics, experts, and civil society members.

Selection criteria should be based on public service, innovation, and social impact.

The nomination and evaluation process should be made public.

Only then can the civil awards rise above controversy and reflect genuine national pride.

Karachi’s Roads: A City Under Siege

While debates around civil awards continue, Karachi faces a far deadlier crisis: its roads have become death traps. Pakistan’s largest metropolis is turning into an open graveyard, where motorcyclists, car passengers, and pedestrians alike live under constant threat.

The statistics are chilling:

In the first seven months of 2025, 546 people died and over 8,100 were injured in traffic accidents.

Heavy vehicles alone caused 165 deaths.

In 2024, 616 deaths were recorded—four times higher than the previous year.

In 2023, the situation was catastrophic: over 1,400 deaths and 18,000 injuries. On average, 500 people were affected daily.

Motorcyclists accounted for 58% of deaths, while pedestrians made up 24%.

Karachi hosts 6.5 million vehicles, of which 4.4 million are motorcycles, the most vulnerable group.

Each day, 15,000–16,000 trucks and 5,000 dumpers enter the city, many with armed guards, spreading fear and chaos.

Broken roads, poor lighting, lack of speed enforcement, and weak law enforcement fuel the carnage. Authorities have imposed night restrictions on heavy vehicles, introduced QR-code certification, and increased fines. A “Karachi Road Accident Analysis Team” has been set up, yet fatalities continue.

As one grieving citizen remarked after losing a family crushed under an oil tanker:

> “This is not an accident; it is the criminal negligence of the state and the transport mafia.”

This is not just Karachi’s tragedy—it is a warning for Pakistan as a whole.

Governance, Politics, and Constitutional Boundaries

The crisis of governance extends beyond traffic. Political tensions deepened when Karachi Mayor Murtaza Wahab urged Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to take notice of Governor Sindh Kamran Tessori’s political activities.

By law, a governor is supposed to be neutral, representing the federation, not a political party. Yet, Tessori’s remarks on reviving the “old MQM” and bringing back the “bhai” stirred debate. The Mayor sarcastically commented: “He thinks of himself as the bhai.”

At the same time, Wahab highlighted development projects under PPP’s municipal leadership—such as the K-IV water project (long delayed by successive governments), improvements to the Hub Canal, children’s health centers, and facilities for special children. He claimed these reflect PPP’s commitment to Karachi’s people.

However, critics argue that Karachi’s deep-rooted crises—water shortages, sewage failures, broken transport, collapsing health systems—cannot be solved through piecemeal projects or political point-scoring.

Interestingly, while Wahab insists governors should stay away from politics, Pakistan’s broader reality suggests otherwise. Governors in Punjab and KP also give political statements, and even the President is a party leader. In such a political culture, constitutional neutrality often remains a theory rather than practice.

 Security and Society

Despite fears, Independence Day celebrations and the Chehlum of Imam Hussain (A.S.) were held peacefully across Karachi, thanks to extraordinary efforts by law enforcement and administration. Authorities often demonstrate efficiency in organizing state ceremonies—but far less commitment when it comes to resolving people’s everyday problems.

A tragic development shook the city’s journalistic community when young reporter Khawar Hussain was found dead in his car outside a restaurant in Sanghar, his hometown. Police termed it a suicide, but colleagues demanded an impartial investigation, raising concerns about safety and transparency.

Conclusion: Karachi as a Test Case

Karachi, Pakistan’s economic engine and largest city, is more than a local issue—it is a test case for governance, law enforcement, and constitutional boundaries.

If civil awards remain politicized, if roads continue to claim lives unchecked, and if constitutional offices abandon neutrality, Pakistan risks eroding both public trust and national unity.

The choice is stark: either establish transparency, enforce law, and prioritize citizens’ welfare—or continue watching as both national honours and human lives lose their sanctity.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary 

 Mubasher Mir

Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah has announced the schedule for the events to be held across the province on the occasion of Independence Day. Addressing a press conference at the Sindh Information Department’s social media cell, the Chief Minister stated that the central theme of the events, which began on August 1, will be "The Battle of Truth," symbolizing national pride and the victory of truth over oppression.

The press conference was attended by Provincial Ministers Sharjeel Inam Memon, Nasir Shah, Saeed Ghani, Mohammad Bakhsh Khan Mehr, and Zulfiqar Shah.

Murad Ali Shah emphasized that this year’s events would not be limited to ceremonial functions but would aim to instill a renewed sense of patriotism, highlight the cultural beauty of Sindh, and encourage those who have rebuilt their lives after the recent floods.

He stated that this year’s Independence Day would not only commemorate freedom but also refresh the memory of the victory of truth over India, underscoring the difference between a free nation and the plight of oppressed peoples.

The Chief Minister also revealed that economic improvement projects would be presented to the public, including his flagship program, "Udaan Pakistan." He invited all political parties to participate in the events, stating that formal invitations would be sent soon. He mentioned that schools would remain open during this time, and the education department would organize special programs in commemoration of Independence Day.

Special arrangements were made for those traveling to Gorakh Hill and Thar. The Chief Minister expressed hope that there would be strong participation in the concerts to be held in Karachi, Hyderabad, and Sukkur.

Sindh Governor Kamran Tessori, while speaking about the Independence Day programs, mentioned that the Chehlum of Imam Hussain would be observed on August 15. However, he urged that the gatherings begin earlier, but with simplicity, to maintain respect for the martyrs of Karbala.

In the Sindh Assembly, a joint resolution was passed in response to NEPRA’s decision to impose an additional Rs 50 billion burden on electricity consumers in Karachi. The resolution was introduced by MQM’s Aamir Siddiqui, PPP’s Heer Sohoo, and PTI’s Shabbir Qureshi. Before the resolution's approval, members from both the government and opposition criticized the poor performance of electricity distribution companies in Sindh, prolonged load shedding, and the unfair collection of heavy electricity bills from consumers.

Senior Sindh Minister for Information, Transport, and Mass Transit Sharjeel Inam Memon criticized the failure of power distribution companies, particularly K-Electric, HESCO, and SEPCO. He noted that resolutions against these companies had been presented in the assembly multiple times, but unfortunately, the concerned authorities had never responded adequately.

To address the energy crisis, the Sindh government has started providing solar systems to citizens living in extreme temperatures, but this is not a permanent solution. Sharjeel Memon stressed that a long-term, sustainable solution to the energy crisis must be found. He suggested that power distribution companies introduce prepaid meters to not only resolve complaints but also eliminate issues like electricity theft. He also said that either prepaid meters should be installed, or the practice of collective punishment on consumers must end.

Memon pointed out that the punishment for K-Electric's line losses is being imposed on the entire population of Karachi. During the election campaign, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had promised that 300 units of electricity would be provided for free. In response to a question at the Federation House, Sindh Minister for Local Government Syed Nasir Hussain Shah stated that this promise would be fulfilled once Bilawal Bhutto Zardari becomes the Prime Minister. For now, solar systems are being provided.

Karachi Mayor Barrister Murtaza Wahab inaugurated a Fish Food Street in Kemari, which is a unique recreational initiative by the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) aimed at providing citizens with a new place to enjoy. The inaugural ceremony was attended by Deputy Mayor of Karachi Salman Abdullah Murad, Member Sindh Assembly Asif Khan, MPA Liaquat Skani, Deputy Parliamentary Leader of the City Council Dil Mohammad, Jaman Darwan, and other dignitaries.

While this initiative provides a new center for food and entertainment, Mayor Wahab’s priorities seem puzzling. Given that it is currently the breeding season for fish, the capture and consumption of fish should be restricted. However, he chose to inaugurate a food street instead.

There is a dire lack of attention to the city's urban forest. KMC should focus on developing forests, as Karachi suffers from extreme heat, and millions of children are deprived of basic education. Mayor Wahab should focus on improving KMC schools, as even a laborer refuses to send their children to government schools.

Although a food street has been established along the coast before, the growing garbage in the sea has not received the necessary attention. The vision that Karachi desperately needs seems to be missing.

The Unfair Economic Senario

 The Unfair Economic Senario

Mubasher Mir

In the thick of a sweltering July, Pakistan stands at a crossroads—an old story retold with grimmer lines. The Federal and Provincial budgets for 2025-2026, framed under the vigilant gaze of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have arrived not with relief but with renewed burdens for the common man. No stimulus for the struggling, no sanctuary for the sinking middle class—only directives, levies, and silence in the face of despair.

With each revision of fuel prices and every bill tucked under a door crack, a louder question echoes across Pakistan’s bazaars, teashops, and households: Where does this all end?

In Pakistan today, surviving itself is a luxury.

The recent hikes in petroleum prices have not just affected transport—an entire supply chain has become costlier overnight.  The ripple effects are immediate and merciless: from vegetables in the market to medicine on the shelves, inflation seeps into every corner of life. Electricity tariffs, adjusted under circular debt settlements, have crossed the capacity for domestic consumers. Meanwhile, gas bills have doubled for even modest households.

According to the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate  disproportionately impacting lower-income groups who spend up to 80% of their income on essentials. Contrast this with the per capita income, which, after adjustments for inflation, is estimated at around USD 1,560 annually in 2025—a figure both painful and pitiful when set against the cost of living.

Yet, those in power remain largely insulated from these harsh truths.

Now, it looks we are

Two Nations: Rich and Poor unfortunately.

Pakistan today is not a failed state, but a fractured one—split between haves and have-nots. Corporate profits soar while millions live below the poverty line. In the financial year ending June 2025, Habib Bank Limited declared profits of PKR 71 billion. MCB Bank posted PKR 45 billion. Non-banking corporates like Engro, Lucky Cement, and the automotive giants are not far behind. At the same time, over 40% of the population (more than 90 million people) lives on less than USD 3.65 a day, the World Bank’s lower-middle-income poverty line.

The commercial banking sector, backed by the State Bank of Pakistan’s interest rate , continues to profit through high spreads. Credit card interest rates are now close to 44% annually, and bank charges on basic accounts and transactions have grown steeply—making financial inclusion a bitter joke. For the salaried class and micro-entrepreneurs, banking has become a trap rather than a tool.

Pakistan’s tax regime, instead of being progressive, seems punitive. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) continues to miss targets despite raising taxes on electricity, mobile usage, fuel, and salaried individuals. The newly introduced 2.5% super tax on high-income earners is not trickling down as intended. Even more absurd is the taxation of already stressed small businesses through fixed and turnover taxes.

According to the IMF’s 2024 Article IV report, Pakistan’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains stuck at around 9.2%—among the lowest in the world. Yet, ordinary citizens face indirect taxes in every corner of their daily spending, effectively paying the price of elite evasion and government inefficiency.

The GDP growth rate for FY2024-25 was just 2.3%, and is projected to remain under 3% next year, per World Bank estimates. This stagnation underscores the irrationality of revenue-focused budgeting in a contracting economy.

Government expenditures show no sign of matching public austerity. Ministers travel in convoys, official lunches stretch into lakhs, and foreign delegations continue their journeys to Geneva and Dubai—all while hospitals face medicine shortages and universities lay off faculty.

Pakistan’s Human Development Index (HDI), as reported by UNDP, remains shamefully low at 0.544, ranking 161 out of 193 countries. Indicators like child mortality, female literacy, and access to clean water continue to reflect systemic neglect. This disconnect between public hardship and elite privilege breeds more than resentment—it breeds unrest.

The regulators of Pakistan’s economic destiny—SECP, State Bank of Pakistan, and the Pakistan Stock Exchange—remain aloof or compromised. Their mandate to ensure financial fairness has been overtaken by the obligation to remain in step with external financiers.

The State Bank, now operating with “autonomous” status under IMF agreements, is less a central bank and more a transmission belt for global financial dictates. It adjusts interest rates without heed to local consequences, deepening rather than healing the wounds of inflation and unemployment.

Insurance companies too, under the SECP’s lax oversight, prefer investment portfolios over assurance. Rather than extending risk coverage to agricultural or informal sectors, they chase government bonds and real estate gains. Pakistan’s insurance penetration remains at a paltry 0.9% of GDP.

What makes the economic crisis unbearable is not only its scale but its unfairness. The system is no longer indifferent—it appears extractive. When a poor family pays more in indirect taxes than a corporate group pays in income tax, when a child’s malnutrition is the price of a defence deal, when a student’s dream withers under unaffordable tuition while bureaucrats enjoy subsidized plots—this is not governance, it is betrayal and 

this betrayal is feeding a new consciousness.

Independent media and civil society voices are rising despite censorship and intimidation. Journalists, economists, and digital creators are dissecting the façade of fiscal responsibility and exposing the core of cruelty in economic planning.

In the 2025 Gallup Pakistan Poll, over 67% of respondents said they believe the government does not prioritize the common man in its economic policies. Protests over electricity bills in Sindh, wheat procurement issues in Punjab, and teacher layoffs in KPk are more frequent and intense.This has been learnt that

the people are not just angry—they are awakening.

There is no magic solution, but there is a starting point: fair regulation and fearless accountability.

We need a financial sector that supports real economic activity—not one that profits from scarcity. We need a tax system that asks more of the privileged and less of the precarious. We need public spending that reflects empathy, not entitlement. We need insurance that insures, regulators that regulate, and banks that serve—not enslave.

Above all, we need people’s representatives to remember why they are called representatives. Parliamentary presence must become purposeful. Legislative debates must turn from theater to truth-seeking. The idea of Pakistan, as envisioned by Iqbal and Jinnah, was not one where the state extracts life from its citizens in the name of stability

Unfair economic systems have short lives. They carry the seeds of collapse in their very operation. Whether through democratic renewal, policy reform, or the eruption of mass dissent—change becomes inevitable when justice is denied for too long.

Let us be clear: Pakistan’s potential is not dead. Its people remain resilient. Its youth are brilliant. But their patience has a limit.

The time for excuses has passed. The future must belong to fairness—or not at all.

Karachi Political Reflections

 Karachi  Political Reflections

 Mubasher Mir

In a series of recent diplomatic events in Karachi, the Consulate General of France and Türkiye commemorated their national days — each rooted in moments of profound national transformation. These events not only marked significant historical milestones but also offered an opportunity to reflect on Pakistan’s contemporary challenges through the lens of these pivotal revolutions and democratic movements.

Commemorating Bastille Day: The French Struggle for Equality

At a local hotel, the French Consulate General in Karachi celebrated Bastille Day — observed on July 14th — a defining moment in French history. The French Consul General, Alexis Chahtahtinsky, addressed the gathering, explaining the symbolic and historical significance of the storming of the Bastille Prison in 1789.

The Bastille, once a fortress turned into a state prison, represented the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI, where political prisoners were detained without trial. The storming of this prison became a powerful symbol of the people’s resistance against oppression, class inequality, and arbitrary power. The revolution, rooted in the Enlightenment principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity, triggered profound structural changes in France and across Europe. It forced the monarchy into reforms and culminated in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, enshrining civil liberties that echo in democratic constitutions to this day (Schama, Citizens, 1989).

In his address, the Consul General highlighted the longstanding Franco-Pakistani relations, particularly in defence cooperation. He cited Pakistan’s acquisition of Mirage fighter aircraft, still operational with the Pakistan Air Force, and the collaborative development of Agosta-class submarines — a project that tragically witnessed the 2002 terrorist attack on French engineers in Karachi. These examples underscore both the depth of cooperation and the challenges faced in the pursuit of strategic ties.

Türkiye’s July 15th: A People’s Victory Over a Coup

In a parallel ceremony, the Turkish Consulate General in Karachi observed the Day of Democracy and National Unity, commemorating the failed coup attempt of July 15, 2016. The Consul General, Cemal Sangu, addressed attendees and recounted the dramatic and harrowing events of that evening — when a faction within the Turkish military attempted to overthrow the democratically elected government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

The coup plotters launched airstrikes on the Turkish Parliament, police headquarters, and attempted to seize key government installations using tanks and helicopters. President Erdoğan, narrowly escaping capture, addressed the nation via FaceTime, urging citizens to resist. In a moment that reshaped Turkish political identity, millions of civilians took to the streets, confronting tanks with nothing but flags and resolve. Over 250 people were killed, and more than 2,000 were injured defending the democratic order (Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, 2016).

In the days that followed, a large-scale crackdown ensued. The government accused exiled cleric Fethullah Gülen of orchestrating the coup, which he denied. Tens of thousands of civil servants, military personnel, and judges were dismissed or arrested. While the incident raised concerns over civil liberties, it also cemented a national consensus on preserving democracy, celebrated each year as a day of unity and patriotism.

Parallels with Pakistan: Revolution, Resistance, and Relevance

These historical moments in France and Türkiye are not merely foreign events — they hold a mirror to Pakistan’s own democratic journey.

Pakistan today grapples with glaring socio-economic inequalities reminiscent of pre-revolutionary France. A small elite — comprised of the political class, landed aristocracy, and bureaucratic power centers — controls national wealth and decision-making. Meanwhile, the vast majority of citizens suffer under the weight of inflation, over-taxation, poor services, and crumbling institutions. As in 18th-century France, the voices of ordinary people are increasingly marginalized, while the ruling class remains insulated in privilege.

Similarly, Pakistan has witnessed numerous instances of democratic disruption — where elected governments have been overthrown through unconstitutional means, often under the guise of corruption or national security. Yet, unlike the powerful public response seen in Türkiye, Pakistan’s public resistance has often been fragmented or muted. As political historian Dr. Ayesha Jalal notes in The Struggle for Pakistan (2014), the country has struggled to transition from a security state to a participatory democracy, where the ballot carries supreme legitimacy.

The Rise of Digital Resistance: A New Frontier

However, signs of democratic awakening are emerging. In the absence of institutional accountability, social media has evolved into a powerful instrument of civic engagement in Pakistan. A recent example from Balochistan demonstrates this shift. A man and woman were brutally murdered under a tribal jirga ruling, accused of dishonoring tradition, despite claiming to be legally married. The local administration remained silent, and the incident would have been buried — had it not been for the public outcry on social media platforms.

Facing widespread digital backlash, the Chief Minister of Balochistan admitted to prior knowledge of the incident and was compelled to take action. Authorities arrested the accused and presented them in court. This is not an isolated case — across Pakistan, we are seeing a new digital consciousness, where citizens demand transparency, justice, and reform, often forcing lethargic institutions to respond.

Conclusion: Between Legacy and Destiny

France and Türkiye’s national histories offer profound lessons for Pakistan. From revolutionary France, we learn that systemic inequality, if left unaddressed, breeds explosive consequences. From modern Türkiye, we see the power of collective civic action in defending democracy. Both nations remind us that people, not power, are the true custodians of the state.

Pakistan stands at a crossroads. Without governance reforms, institutional accountability, and respect for democratic mandates, the gulf between the state and citizenry will continue to widen. Yet, with the rise of digital activism, a politically aware youth, and a civil society no longer willing to remain silent — the tide may be turning.

History does not repeat itself, but as Mark Twain aptly observed, it often rhymes. The challenge now is whether Pakistan will learn from history — or become a case study for it.

Karachi Political Diary

 Karachi Political Diary

Mubashir Mir 

Karachi, the political and economic nerve center of Pakistan, continues to be a reflection of the broader national tensions and aspirations. The city’s streets buzz not just with trade and traffic but with rumors, political maneuvering, civic unrest, and a cultural melancholy that reflects the state of a country in flux.

Rumors of Presidential Resignation – A Political Earthquake or a Media Mirage?

For several days in early July 2024, whispers and rumors of President Asif Ali Zardari's resignation swept through media circles, WhatsApp groups, and political drawing rooms with startling velocity. This speculation pointed toward a seismic shift in Pakistan's political landscape. Despite the magnitude of these rumors, neither President Zardari nor the Presidential Secretariat issued any official clarification initially. This silence was interpreted by many as either a sign of internal deliberation or political strategy.

However, several provincial ministers from the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) eventually spoke up, denying any such development. The Prime Minister and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leadership also rejected the claims. Most notably, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi dismissed the rumors outright in a formally convened press conference, labeling them as "fabricated and baseless."

Adding credibility to the President's continuing involvement, the Presidency’s website published proceedings of a July 8 meeting regarding canal infrastructure, accompanied by a regular press release from the Press Information Department. The transparency of this meeting, and its public documentation, seemed designed to quell the resignation speculation and reaffirm the President's active role.

In the age of digital misinformation and politically motivated rumors, such episodes highlight the critical need for proactive communication from public offices to preserve public trust and institutional stability.

The Waning Echoes of Altaf Hussain

Once the most dominant voice in urban Sindh politics, Altaf Hussain—the founder of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM)—is reportedly gravely ill and hospitalized in London. Time, politics, and inner-party fractures have eroded his once-unquestioned influence.

His former party, now restructured as MQM-Pakistan, has formally distanced itself from him. Internationally, former allies have also begun disassociating, reflecting a shift toward localized, pragmatic political realignment. Yet, Hussain continues to release periodic video messages, expressing disillusionment with former comrades while notably offering moral support to incarcerated PTI leader and ex-Prime Minister Imran Khan.

His sympathy for Khan, though ideological opposites at one time, reflects the evolving political alliances forged more from common grievance than shared vision. Hussain’s political legacy remains contested, but his influence continues to echo in the hearts of some loyalists in Karachi and Hyderabad.

Motorcycle Number Plate Campaign – Policy or Punishment?

The Sindh government recently launched a campaign to standardize motorcycle number plates across the province. Though well-intentioned to combat rising vehicle-related crimes and regulatory noncompliance, the campaign has come under scrutiny for its implementation and financial implications.

Motorcycle riders, many of whom belong to the lower-middle class, are being penalized harshly for non-compliance. The cost of replacing number plates—reportedly between Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 1,500—is a burden for many daily wage earners. Afaq Ahmed, the head of MQM-Haqiqi, has publicly criticized the campaign, calling it "exploitative."

Meanwhile, DIG Traffic has enforced stringent action, with motorcyclists being stopped at checkpoints across Karachi. Police conduct, in many cases, has reverted to the “traditional” approach—marked by harassment and bribe-seeking. What could have been a collaborative public-safety initiative has instead deepened the public’s mistrust in traffic regulation and law enforcement.

A Bhutto Renaissance?

 Fatima, Zulfiqar Jr., and a New Political Dream

The Bhutto family continues to cast a long shadow over Pakistani politics, but now a new generation is emerging from outside the PPP hierarchy. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Jr., son of the late Murtaza Bhutto, is preparing to launch a new political party with support from his sister Fatima Bhutto, a noted writer and critic of dynastic politics.

Sources suggest that the party will primarily focus on engaging Sindh's youth, offering an alternative to the established PPP leadership under Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and Asifa Bhutto Zardari. Zulfiqar Jr.'s effort to learn Sindhi reflects an earnest desire to connect with grassroots constituencies. Fatima Bhutto’s political debut would carry symbolic weight—especially given her past criticism of Pakistan's ruling elite and her refusal, until now, to join electoral politics.

There is also speculation that Sassi Bhutto, daughter of Shahnawaz Bhutto, may join this venture, creating a new "Bhutto bloc" potentially positioned as a counter to Zardari's PPP. However, ideological differences and emotional wounds stemming from the death of Murtaza Bhutto in 1996—and the family’s subsequent alienation from opponants—remain significant barriers to reconciliation.

PTI’s 90-Day Movement – Momentum or Mirage?

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) initially announced a mass movement to begin on August 5, 2024, but later rebranded it as a “90-day movement.” Despite the bold rhetoric, enthusiasm appears to be missing, particularly in Sindh, where the PTI has historically struggled to mobilize grassroots support.

Aliya Hamza Malik, one of PTI’s more dynamic voices, has expressed disappointment with the slow organizational pace. Former President Dr. Arif Alvi, previously seen as a moral compass within PTI, has chosen political silence, distancing himself from overt activism.

Reports of Imran Khan’s sons—Sulaiman and Qasim—visiting Pakistan have stirred some optimism within the PTI ranks. Their presence, possibly accompanied by international media, could reinvigorate the party's support base. If strategically managed, their involvement could lend PTI a significant psychological boost—especially with a disillusioned youth demographic.

Economic Distress and the Business Community’s Revolt

Pakistan’s economic turmoil shows no signs of abating. The FY2024-25 federal budget, largely shaped under IMF direction, has been widely criticized. The budget’s heavy reliance on indirect taxation, especially energy tariffs, has sparked fury within the business community.

Traders across Pakistan, particularly in Karachi, are calling for a nationwide strike on July 19, demanding relief from crushing utility costs and unpredictable fiscal policies. If the strike—backed by key organizations like the All Karachi Tajir Ittehad and FPCCI—is successful, it could halt operations at Pakistan’s two largest ports, disrupting the country’s supply chain.

The business community has proposed a 50% cut in government expenditures, especially criticizing lavish perks for top officials. The reported increase in salaries for the Senate Chairman and National Assembly Speaker—effective retroactively from January 1—has only intensified public resentment.

If the government fails to negotiate and respond empathetically, this movement may spiral into a broader economic protest, potentially catalyzing political instability.

Artist Welfare and Cultural Neglect

A pall of sorrow hangs over Karachi’s artist community following the tragic discovery of model and performer Humaira Asghar Ali’s decomposed body in a flat in DHA. This heartbreaking incident reflects systemic neglect of Pakistan’s aging or struggling artists.

The Arts Council of Pakistan, Karachi—meant to support the cultural sector—has come under fire for failing to provide support. Humaira's case follows the lonely deaths of Ayesha Khan and long-suffering actor-writer Athar Shah Khan Jaidi, both members of the Council.

Although the Sindh government allocates Rs. 450 million annually to the Arts Council, there is growing concern about transparency and mismanagement. Justice Salahuddin Panhore of the Sindh High Court previously ordered an audit of the institution, but the matter has stalled in the Supreme Court with no visible progress.

A new, centralized welfare mechanism—managed independently—could address this cultural crisis. The state owes its artists not just applause in life but dignity in their final years.

Conclusion: Karachi’s Pulse Mirrors Pakistan’s Uncertainty

From power corridors to roadside tea stalls, Karachi is grappling with uncertainty—political, economic, and emotional. Whether it's the whisper of a presidential resignation, the revival of Bhutto legacy politics, or the quiet grief of forgotten artists, the city reflects the wider malaise of a nation at a crossroads.

The government, political parties, and civil society must rise to the occasion—not only to manage crises but to preempt them. A country where presidents are ghosted, artists die in silence, and the public drowns under inflation must ask itself: is this sustainable? If not, then what will it take to change?